'Yancin Dan Adam a kasar Sin

'Yancin Dan Adam a kasar Sin
human rights by country or territory (en) Fassara
Bayanai
Ƙasa Sin
Perpetrator (en) Fassara Xi Jinping, Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping (en) Fassara, Jiang Zemin da Hu Jintao

Kungiyoyin kasa da kasa suna nazarin haƙƙin ɗan adam a kasar Sin lokaci-lokaci, kamar su hukumomin yarjejeniyar haƙƙin ɗanɗano da kuma Binciken Lokaci na Duniya na Majalisar Kare Hakkin Dan Adam ta Majalisar Dinkin Duniya.[1] Jam'iyyar Kwaminis ta kasar Sin (CCP), Gwamnatin Jamhuriyar Jama'ar Sin (PRC), magoya bayansu, da sauran masu goyon baya suna da'awar cewa manufofi da matakan tilasta aiki sun isa don karewa daga cin zarafin bil'adama. Koyaya, wasu ƙasashe (kamar Amurka da Kanada), ƙungiyoyin da ba na gwamnati ba (NGOs) ciki har da 'Yancin Dan Adam a China da Amnesty International, da' yan ƙasa, lauyoyi, da Masu adawa a cikin ƙasar, sun bayyana cewa hukumomi a kasar Sin suna ba da izini ko shirya irin wannan cin zarafi.

Kungiyoyin ba da agaji masu zaman kansu kamar Amnesty International da Human Rights Watch, da kuma cibiyoyin gwamnati na kasashen waje kamar Ma'aikatar Harkokin Wajen Amurka, a kai a kai suna gabatar da shaidar cewa PRC ta keta 'yancin magana, motsi, da Addini na' yan ƙasa da sauransu a cikin iko. Hukumomi a cikin PRC suna da'awar inganta haƙƙin ɗan adam, kamar yadda suke bayyana su daban, don su dogara da "al'adun ƙasa" da matakin ci gaba ƙasar.[2] Koyaya, gwamnatoci suna da alhakin ingantawa da kare dukkan haƙƙin ɗan adam a duk duniya, ba tare da la'akari da yanayin ƙasarsu ba.[3] 'Yan siyasa na PRC sun ci gaba da cewa, bisa ga Kundin Tsarin Mulki na PRC, "Ka'idoji huɗu" sun maye gurbin' 'Yancin zama ɗan ƙasa. Jami'an PRC suna fassara muhimmancin Ka'idojin Kaddada guda huɗu a matsayin tushen doka don kama mutanen da gwamnati ta ce suna neman kawar da ka'idojin. 'Yan kasar Sin waɗanda hukumomi suka ga suna bin waɗannan ka'idoji, a gefe guda, hukumomin PRC sun ba su izinin jin daɗi da kuma aiwatar da duk haƙƙoƙin da suka zo tare da zama ɗan ƙasa na PRC, muddin ba su keta dokokin PRC ta kowace hanya ba.

Kungiyoyin kare hakkin dan adam da yawa sun yada batutuwan kare hakkin dan Adam a kasar Sin da suke ganin gwamnati ba ta da kyau, gami da: hukuncin kisa (shar da kisa), manufofin yaro daya (wanda kasar Sin ta yi banbanci ga 'yan tsiraru na kabilanci kafin a soke shi a shekarar 2015), matsayin siyasa da shari'a na Tibet, da kuma watsi da' yancin yada labarai a kasar Sin. Sauran wuraren damuwa sun haɗa da rashin amincewar doka game da haƙƙin ɗan adam da rashin shari'a mai zaman kanta, mulkin doka, da kuma tsari da ya dace. Ƙarin batutuwan da aka tayar game da haƙƙin ɗan adam sun haɗa da rashin haƙƙin ma'aikata (musamman wanda ke ƙuntata 'yancin motsi na ma'aikata masu ƙaura), rashin ƙungiyoyin ma'aikata marasa zaman kansu daga CCP, [4] [5] aiwatar da Tsarin Kudin Jama'a da jerin sunayen ba da izini, waɗanda ke aiki don ƙuntata mutum da haƙƙin membobin danginsu, [6] da kuma zargin nuna bambanci ga ma'aikatan karkara da 'yancin addini - ƙungiyoyin addinin Tibet, [7] [5] [6] [5] [5] [6] [5] [5] [6] [5] [8] [5] [6] [5] [9] [5] [6] [5] [10] [5] [6] [5] [11] [5] [6] [5] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [5] [6] [7] [6] [5] [6] [7] [7] [5] [6] [10] [5] [6] [7] [8] [5] [6] [7] [10] [5] [6] [10] [10] [5] [6] [6] [5] [6] [10] [6] [5] [6] [6] [7] [5] [5] [6] [7] [4] [5] [6] [10] [4] [5] [6] [6] [10] [5] [5] [6] [10]  – Wasu kungiyoyin masu fafutuka na kasar Sin suna kokarin fadada wadannan 'yanci, ciki har da' yancin dan adam a kasar Sin, Masu kare hakkin dan adam na kasar Sin, da kuma Kungiyar Lauyoyin Kare Hakkin Dan Adam ta kasar Sin. Lauyoyin kare hakkin dan adam na kasar Sin wadanda ke daukar shari'o'in da suka shafi wadannan batutuwan, duk da haka, sau da yawa suna fuskantar cin zarafi, korarsu, da kamawa.[12][13]

A cewar rahoton Amnesty International daga 2016/2017 gwamnati ta ci gaba da tsarawa da aiwatar da jerin sabbin dokokin tsaron kasa wadanda suka gabatar da babbar barazana ga kare haƙƙin ɗan adam. Rikicin da aka yi wa lauyoyin kare hakkin dan adam da masu fafutuka ya ci gaba a duk shekara. Masu fafutuka da masu kare hakkin dan adam sun ci gaba da kasancewa cikin sa ido, cin zarafi, tsoratarwa, kamawa, da tsare-tsare.[14] Rahoton ya ci gaba da cewa 'yan sanda sun tsare adadi mai yawa na masu kare hakkin dan adam a waje da wuraren tsare-tsare na al'ada, wani lokacin ba tare da samun damar zuwa lauya ba na dogon lokaci, suna fallasa wadanda aka tsare ga haɗarin azabtarwa da sauran rashin kulawa. Masu sayar da littattafai, masu bugawa, masu gwagwarmaya, da kuma ɗan jarida wanda ya ɓace a ƙasashe makwabta a cikin 2015 da 2016 sun fito a tsare a China, suna haifar da damuwa game da hukumomin tilasta bin doka na China da ke aiki a waje da ikonsu.[14]

A cikin rahoton kare hakkin dan adam wanda ke kimanta 'yancin zamantakewa, tattalin arziki, da siyasa, kasar Sin ta sami matsayi mafi ƙasƙanci a duniya don aminci daga ayyukan gwamnati da haƙƙin taruwa.

  1. "China". Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved 2 February 2024.
  2. "Progress in China's Human Rights Cause in 1996". March 1997.
  3. "Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action". Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 25 June 1993. paragraph I.5. Retrieved 2 February 2024.
  4. "Trade Union Law and Collective Bargaining in China". China Business Review (in Turanci). 21 April 2017. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  5. 中华全国总工会网站. acftu.org (in Harshen Sinanci). Archived from the original on 18 June 2019. Retrieved 23 November 2018.
  6. "Social Credit System in China: Why it is so scary". Nov 10, 2022.
  7. "Christians face waves of persecution". 24 November 2001. Archived from the original on 14 January 2012. Retrieved 13 January 2016.
  8. "China's Crackdown on Christians Worsens, Christian News". 7 February 2008. Retrieved 13 January 2012.
  9. "Chinese government persecutes dissidents | TheCabin.net – Conway, Arkansas". Archived from the original on 27 February 2019. Retrieved 13 January 2013.
  10. Department of State. The Office of Electronic Information, Bureau of Public Affairs (19 September 2008). "China includes Tibet, Hong Kong, Macau". Retrieved 13 January 2012.
  11. "The Social Credit System: Not Just Another Chinese Idiosyncrasy". May 1, 2020.
  12. Human Rights Watch. Walking on Thin Ice 28 April 2008.
  13. Amnesty International, "China: No Rule of Law when Defence Lawyers Cannot Perform their Legitimate Role", 5 October 2010
  14. 14.0 14.1 "Human rights in China". Amnesty International.

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search